Showing posts with label 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2012. Show all posts
Saturday, 25 August 2012
It's That Time Again.
Carnival kicks off tomorrow and the preparations are well under way. Many businesses seem to have given up on Saturday trading altogether and are already boarded up for the duration..
I'm not sure why Barclays Bank on Ladbroke Grove found it necessary to close for the day, not even the ATM's were accessible. The boarding up could easily have been carried out at close of business but I suppose that an extended Bank Holiday weekend seemed more attractive than providing a service to their customers........
........and you were also out of luck if you wanted to return your library book, but hey, you can always dispute the fine for being overdue!
Finally, let's hope the weather improves for Sunday and Monday. We really don't want anymore skies like this. We've been fairly lucky for the last few years, but the best you could say about today's weather was that it was unsettled. We've had the odd spot of sun, occasional blue skies and an unreasonable amount of rain, thunder and lightning.
Whatever the weather have a happy and peaceful Carnival.
More pictures here.
Saturday, 19 May 2012
NIMBY
Firstly, I
should make my position clear. I’m not a fan of the Olympics. No one asked me
if I wanted them inflicted on me. No one asked me if I wanted to be paying for
them for the rest of my life. No one asked me if I was happy to put up with the
disruption. No one asked!
This
morning the 70 day Torch Relay kicked off from Lands End and the news coverage sparked the following text conversation………
Friend:
What is the point of this torch thing? Why why why? And why are so many people
enthused by it? What am I missing?
Friend:
They are just talking about it but I have seen no actual footage of any actual
torch carrying. Oh I am confused. It’s a PR exercise.
Me: The
point is to try to drag in the needy, the misguided, the provincial and the
indifferent into the Olympic Party. To unify the nation behind the Olympic
ideal and to induce councils to spend money they haven’t got to prove what a
great deal we are all getting out of this event. I think propaganda would be an
appropriate word.
Mind
you, the best thing about the last Olympics was Konnie Huq and the Torch Relay
being attacked by Chinese dissidents in Ladbroke Grove. I can’t remember why
the torch was in Ladbroke Grove in the first place but then again I DON’T CARE!
To be
honest, my tongue did venture into my cheek during this statement but only to
the extent that I wouldn’t have wished this
experience on Konnie Huq, or indeed anyone else, she seems to have had a tough time from both the Pro Tibet protesters and the Chinese torch guards. The rest of it really
does reflect my opinion.
These are
troubled times both with regard to the economy and the political situation. We
are spending vast amounts of money on a few weeks of “fun” and we are inviting those with an axe
to grind to treat this event as a stage on which to forcefully present their
views.
I’m not
convinced by the legacy arguments. On the sporting front, history has shown
that events like this do stimulate some people to take up some of these
activities. Sadly, history also shows that it doesn’t take long for the vast
majority of those people to fall back into their naturally lethargic state. As
far as the social legacy is concerned, the basic fact is that if “they” wanted to revitalise the East End,
then “they” should have spent the money that has, suddenly and miraculously,
become available for the Olympics directly in the area.
Of course
we have gained a great deal from the Olympics.
Disruption
to public transport.
Large payouts to transport staff for extra duties.
Disruption
to local businesses.
Postal delays and surcharges
on Parcelforce deliveries.
A proliferation of rather tacky imported Olympic souvenirs.
A confused
and vastly overpriced ticketing system.
Sponsorship
deals that are seemingly restricting the publics personal freedom to wear what they
like, eat what they like and drink what they like.
Sponsorship
deals that are seemingly in conflict with the spirit of the Olympics (burger
and chips anyone?).
Sponsorship
deals with organisations that some consider to be socially and politically incorrect.
Huge increases in private security including, according to many reports, the use of
heavy handed and seemingly poorly trained operatives.
More armed police on the streets (and the river!) with heavy military backup..
Typhoon
jets on standby.
Surface to air missiles on the roofs of residential and commercial premises.
Snipers on the ground and in helicopters.
The opportunity to pay through the nose for something many of us didn’t want.
The worst Olympic logo of all time.
The worst Olympic logo of all time.
……….and so
much more.
Finally, I
consider myself to be a tolerant person. If people want to support the
Olympics, that’s fine by me, but tolerance goes both ways. I am tired of “personalities”
and “celebrities” telling me to get off of my backside to show my support for the whole show. I do
have a mind of my own (after a fashion!) and am well able to form an opinion
without their assistance and, although it’s too late to do anything about it,
my opinion is……..
…….Not In
My Back Yard!
I have no
Olympic photographs to accompany this post.
No
sportspersons, celebs, personalities, security operatives, military personnel,
sports fans, games officials or politicians were harmed in the writing of this
blog.
Other
opinions are available.
I dedicate
this post to the Grumpy Old Men of this fine nation.
Tuesday, 8 March 2011
24 Hour Tube
London Underground are apparently considering running the tube around the clock for the duration of the Olympics in order to cope with the expected influx of visitors. How is this going to help? How will we persuade these visitors to sensibly stagger their travel plans to make use of all of these extra hours?
We could, I suppose, hold all of the events late at night and time them so that they finish between 1.00 am and 6.00am in the morning, thereby forcing these visitors to travel at the dead of night, when the trains are completely empty.
Or better still, we could simply lock them into the venue, feeding them out into the underground at a steady and regulated rate. Thereby ensuring that the tube doesn’t rattle through the night like the world's least popular and least demanding ghost train.
Or, we could just put up our hands and a say sorry, we’ve made a mistake, we don’t really want the games at all. This last option, although the most sensible, is also the least likely!
In reality, the Games should have gone to Paris in the first place. I’m sure that the average Parisian would have loved the disruption, the crowds, the closed roads and the overloaded transport systems. The added bonus for Londoners would be that they would be paying for all of this for the rest of their lives instead of us!
Of course, some people actually like the Olympics. I'm not one of those people (surprise!) but for the record I would like to wish our athletes every success, we all hope that they will rise to the occasion and that they will be rewarded with fistfulls of medals, especially those nice golden ones, but personally I also expect outstanding results from those responsible for managing the finances and the logistics of the whole affair.
If it ever came down to betting on our gold medal successes versus a financial and logistical triumph, I think that my money would be firmly on the athletes!
We could, I suppose, hold all of the events late at night and time them so that they finish between 1.00 am and 6.00am in the morning, thereby forcing these visitors to travel at the dead of night, when the trains are completely empty.
Or better still, we could simply lock them into the venue, feeding them out into the underground at a steady and regulated rate. Thereby ensuring that the tube doesn’t rattle through the night like the world's least popular and least demanding ghost train.
Or, we could just put up our hands and a say sorry, we’ve made a mistake, we don’t really want the games at all. This last option, although the most sensible, is also the least likely!
In reality, the Games should have gone to Paris in the first place. I’m sure that the average Parisian would have loved the disruption, the crowds, the closed roads and the overloaded transport systems. The added bonus for Londoners would be that they would be paying for all of this for the rest of their lives instead of us!
Of course, some people actually like the Olympics. I'm not one of those people (surprise!) but for the record I would like to wish our athletes every success, we all hope that they will rise to the occasion and that they will be rewarded with fistfulls of medals, especially those nice golden ones, but personally I also expect outstanding results from those responsible for managing the finances and the logistics of the whole affair.
If it ever came down to betting on our gold medal successes versus a financial and logistical triumph, I think that my money would be firmly on the athletes!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)